Recent reports of scientific research carried out into the Shroud of Turin by scientists from Italy’s National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, Enea, do not appear to have been ‘replicated’ in much of the Irish media.
Unless, I’ve missed something, neither the Irish Times nor RTÉ appear to have found the reports newsworthy.
The Irish Independent carried a report by Nick Squire, Turin Shroud not medieval forgery, says new research – Irish Independent – Tue 20 Dec, 2011, which had appeared in the Daily Telegraph, the previous day, under the title Italian study claims Turin Shroud is Christ’s authentic burial robe – Telegraph – Mon 19 Dec, 2011.
But, the British press appears to have given far greater prominence to this shroud research, which constitutes yet another challenge for those attempting to defend a position of atheistic non-belief.
There were, for example, also reports in the (London) Independent, Scientists say Turin Shroud is supernatural – Independent – Tue 20 Dec and the Daily Mail, Could the Shroud of Turin be real after all? Scientists recreate iconic image with ‘blinding flash of light’ – Daily Mail – Tue 20 Dec.
A comparatively sceptical, and, I would say, somewhat biased analysis appears here, Was Holy Shroud created in a flash? Italian researchers resurrect claim – MSNBC – Thu 22 Dec, 2011 on an MSNBC blog. However, it does contain some interesting mediated correspondence between lead researcher Paolo Di Lazzaro and sceptic Joe Nickell.
On the day, when the Catholic Church celebrates the Feast Day of St John the Evangelist — who was the first disciple described in the Gospel to have seen ‘the linen cloths’ — attention is also drawn to the Sudarium of Oviedo. This is believed to have been hooked over Christ’s head, after his death (please see below).
The blood type common to both of these relics is the relatively rare ‘AB’, found in less than 5% of the population.
And, although, the Sudarium contains no image, there are several other coincidences between both objects. For example the length of the nose can be deduced from both pieces of cloth to be eight centimetres in length, and the frontal stains on the Sudarium show seventy points of coincidence with the Shroud.
…and stooping to look in, he saw the linen cloths lying there, but he did not go in. Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb; he saw the linen cloths lying, and the other napkin, which had been on his head, not lying with the linen cloths but rolled up in a place by itself. Then the other disciple, who reached the tomb first, also went in, and he saw and believed; for as yet they did not know the scripture, that he must rise from the dead. (John 20: 5-9)